Re: To take backup of Postgresql Database without large objects - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: To take backup of Postgresql Database without large objects
Date
Msg-id 8f0137a0-cadb-4fc2-8da9-29c9c2d07330@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: To take backup of Postgresql Database without large objects  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 4/11/25 23:05, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Friday, April 11, 2025, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com 
> <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 4/11/25 22:06, sivapostgres@yahoo.com
>     <mailto:sivapostgres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>         Either my command should be wrong or I'm missing something.
> 
> 
>     This was explained in my post as  quoted below.
> 
> 
> Yeah, the short version.  Then you added a long version that just 
> confused the issue.  Why point out exclude blobs if you know they are 
> using bytea?

To show what --no-blobs is actually doing versus what the OP thought it 
was doing, along with link to large object docs to show they are not bytea.

> 
> David J.
> 

-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "sivapostgres@yahoo.com"
Date:
Subject: Re: To take backup of Postgresql Database without large objects
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Clarification on the docs