Re: Clarification on the docs - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Clarification on the docs
Date
Msg-id 371571.1744479884@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Clarification on the docs  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> Because I’m undecided on what exactly would be an improvement and don’t
> care enough on the basis of this single question to put effort into
> figuring that out.  Committers read these and if one of them wants to act
> on my new paragraph suggestion great.  If not, it isn’t that big a deal.
> For me, this doesn’t warrant a CF entry.

I agree this list has gotten a little messy over time, and also that
it's not a big enough deal to warrant a formal patch process.
I tried to improve matters at

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=78637a8be

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: To take backup of Postgresql Database without large objects
Next
From: Brent Wood
Date:
Subject: Re: timescaledb vs NULL vs pg_timeseries vs partman + pgcron + pg_ivm