Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tels
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes
Date
Msg-id 8eca04b1397025f66a08a0cf44a6de0c.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, April 25, 2017 1:21 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 01:06:05PM -0400, Tels wrote:
>> Moin,
>>
>> On Mon, April 24, 2017 9:31 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > I have committed the first draft of the Postgres 10 release notes.
>> They
>> > are current as of two days ago, and I will keep them current.  Please
>> > give me any feedback you have.
>>
>> Thank you! Here is one thing I noticed:
>>
>> "By default planning and execution is display by EXPLAIN ANALYZE and not
>> display in other cases. The new EXPLAIN option SUMMARY allows explicit
>> control of this."
>>
>> The grammar sounds a bit off, I'd suggest:
>>
>> "By default planning and execution time are both displayed by EXPLAIN
>> ANALYZE and not displayed in other cases. The new EXPLAIN option SUMMARY
>> allows explicit control of this feature."
>
> I think all that was missing was "time":
>
>         By default planning and execution time is display by
>         <command>EXPLAIN ANALYZE</> and not display in other cases.
>         The new <command>EXPLAIN</> option <literal>SUMMARY</> allows
>         explicit control of this.

Hm, no, I disagree, the the grammar is not right:

It should be: "X and Y _are_ display_ed_"

instead of:

"X and Y is display"

likewise "and not display_ed_ in other cases."

Best wishes,

Tels



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher