Re: New Object Access Type hooks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: New Object Access Type hooks
Date
Msg-id 8cd8b42f-3f0f-3358-ce6a-0b11ec48363d@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New Object Access Type hooks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: New Object Access Type hooks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: New Object Access Type hooks  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/22/22 14:01, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> OK, I have pushed that.
> It seems like you could remove the NO_INSTALLCHECK restriction
> too.  You already removed the comment defending it, and it
> seems to work fine as an installcheck now if I remove that
> locally.
>
> Other nitpicks:
>
> * the IsParallelWorker test could use a comment
>
> * I notice a typo "permisisons" in test_oat_hooks.sql
>
>             



Fixed


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimize external TOAST storage
Next
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Accept IP addresses in server certificate SANs