Re: New Object Access Type hooks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: New Object Access Type hooks
Date
Msg-id 2572811.1647972119@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New Object Access Type hooks  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: New Object Access Type hooks  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> OK, I have pushed that.

It seems like you could remove the NO_INSTALLCHECK restriction
too.  You already removed the comment defending it, and it
seems to work fine as an installcheck now if I remove that
locally.

Other nitpicks:

* the IsParallelWorker test could use a comment

* I notice a typo "permisisons" in test_oat_hooks.sql

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_walinspect - a new extension to get raw WAL data and WAL stats
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname