RE: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mikheev, Vadim
Subject RE: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace
Date
Msg-id 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D3311@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > FSYNC:        257tps
> > O_DSYNC:      333tps   
> > 
> > Just(?) 30% faster, -:(
> 
> First of all, if you ask me, that is one hell of an improvement :-)

Of course -:) But tfsync tests were more promising -:)
Probably we should update XLogWrite to write() more than 1 block,
but Tom should apply his patches first (btw, did you implement
"log file size" condition for checkpoints, Tom?).

Vadim


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Date:
Subject: xlog patches reviewed
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace