Re: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace
Date
Msg-id 7901.984442532@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace  ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM> writes:
> Probably we should update XLogWrite to write() more than 1 block,
> but Tom should apply his patches first (btw, did you implement
> "log file size" condition for checkpoints, Tom?).

Yes I did.  There's a variable now to specify a checkpoint every N
log segments --- I figured that was good enough resolution, and it
allowed the test to be made only when we're rolling over to a new
segment, so it's not in a time-critical path.

If you're happy with what I did so far, I'll go ahead and commit.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Date:
Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: xlog patches reviewed