Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

RE: Results of testing WAL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mikheev, Vadim
Subject RE: Results of testing WAL
Date
Msg-id 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D3170@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Results of testing WAL  ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
> > Results: 5000 transactions took ~60 sec in 7.1, ~550 sec in 
> > 7.0.2 with fsync and ~60 sec without fsync.
> > 
> > So, seems that WAL added not just complexity to system -:)
> 
> Wow, this sounds fantastic :-) 
> I see my concerns where not justified.

Let's see first how justified are my hopes that WAL code
are bug free -:)

Vadim

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language names
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language names