RE: WAL status update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mikheev, Vadim
Subject RE: WAL status update
Date
Msg-id 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018D85@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: WAL status update  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I believe that its just resting on Vadim again to give us the go ahead
> ... which I believe its always been on his shoulders, no? :)
> 
> Vadim?  

I think that at least 1 & 2 from WAL todo (checkpoints and port to
machines without TAS) is required before beta. As well as more testing...
Did anyone else test WAL recovery?
Sorry guys but I can't do both testing and coding at the same time.
WAL is the most complex thing I've ever did in project.
MVCC was just child's game.

Tom & Bruce are in summit anyway - let's wait them. And I'll do 1 & 2 in
a few days.

Vadim


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin O'Gorman"
Date:
Subject: Contexts
Next
From: Robert Kernell
Date:
Subject: Re: Restricting permissions on Unix socket