Re: WAL status update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: WAL status update
Date
Msg-id 24843.973156496@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: WAL status update  ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM> writes:
> I think that at least 1 & 2 from WAL todo (checkpoints and port to
> machines without TAS) is required before beta.

I'm not sure that you do need to add support for machines without TAS.
I pointed out a couple months ago that the non-TAS support code hasn't
even compiled for the past release or three, and proposed ripping it
all out rather than fixing code that clearly isn't being used.
No one objected.

I haven't got round to doing the ripping yet, but as far as I know
there is no reason to expend work on adding more code for the non-TAS
case.

I have a few other things I still need to do before 7.1 beta.  Do you
think you'll be ready in, say, a week?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Contexts
Next
From: Denis Perchine
Date:
Subject: DROP hangup...