RE: Big 7.1 open items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mikheev, Vadim
Subject RE: Big 7.1 open items
Date
Msg-id 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018C2B@SECTORBASE1
Whole thread Raw
In response to Big 7.1 open items  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses RE: Big 7.1 open items  ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
Re: Big 7.1 open items  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> If we bit the bullet and restricted ourselves to numeric filenames then
> the log would need just four numeric values:
>     database OID
>     tablespace OID

Is someone going to implement it for 7.1?

>     relation OID
>     relation version number

I believe that we can avoid versions using WAL...

> (this set of 4 values would also be an smgr file reference token).
> 16 bytes/log entry looks much better than 64.
> 
> At the moment I can recall the following opinions:
> 
> Pure OID filenames: Thomas, Tom, Marc, Peter E.

+ me.

But what about LOCATIONs? I object using environment and think that
locations
must be stored in pg_control..?

Vadim


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Randall Parker"
Date:
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Next
From: "Hiroshi Inoue"
Date:
Subject: RE: Big 7.1 open items