Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Justin Clift
Subject Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Date
Msg-id 8F03582A-5BA3-495E-9268-06EC78D1739F@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.6 -> 10.0  (Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net>)
Responses Re: 9.6 -> 10.0  (Vik Fearing <vik@2ndquadrant.fr>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On 18 May 2016, at 05:35, Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net> wrote:
> Following up...
>
> It appears from today's PgCon meeting that the majority of core developers agree with my simplified proposal, just
havingMAJOR.PATCH version numbers, and that the plan is to implement that, pending packager/etc feedback. 
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2016_Developer_Meeting#Poll_on_Version_Numbering

Looking at the entry there in the wiki, it says:

  "Simon called for a vote on whether the next release will be 10.0. There was
   already consensus that the next release is 10.0."

For clarity, does that mean this release coming soon is 10.0, or the release
after that - sometime in 2017(?) - is 10.0? :)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi



pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Darren Duncan
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Next
From: Vik Fearing
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0