On 18/05/16 14:51, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 18 May 2016, at 05:35, Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net> wrote:
>> Following up...
>>
>> It appears from today's PgCon meeting that the majority of core developers agree with my simplified proposal, just
havingMAJOR.PATCH version numbers, and that the plan is to implement that, pending packager/etc feedback.
>>
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2016_Developer_Meeting#Poll_on_Version_Numbering
>
> Looking at the entry there in the wiki, it says:
>
> "Simon called for a vote on whether the next release will be 10.0. There was
> already consensus that the next release is 10.0."
>
> For clarity, does that mean this release coming soon is 10.0, or the release
> after that - sometime in 2017(?) - is 10.0? :)
9.6 will be 9.6, the next version will be 10.0 (instead of 9.7).
--
Vik Fearing +33 6 46 75 15 36
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
