Re: "private" installation of postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Ribe
Subject Re: "private" installation of postgres
Date
Msg-id 8B2D1C2B-4879-434A-BCA3-682A97296EDC@killerbytes.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "private" installation of postgres  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: "private" installation of postgres  ("Joshua J. Kugler" <joshua@eeinternet.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Sep 7, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Personally, though, I think it's easier to change the default port
> number and not worry about sharing /tmp.  Changing the port is a good
> idea anyway to avoid any possible conflicts on shared memory IDs.

I was planning on changing the default port number (I forgot to state that in my email), but also moving the socket dir
justto be really sure. 

--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice





pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: "private" installation of postgres
Next
From: pg@slatech.com
Date:
Subject: joins with text search