Re: Bison 3.0 updates - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bison 3.0 updates
Date
Msg-id 8922.1401302632@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bison 3.0 updates  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Bison 3.0 updates  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> What they want is that you use
>     %name-prefix "base_yy"
> instead of
>     %name-prefix="base_yy"
> That makes the warning go away.

Oh really!?

> The %something=something syntax is not documented anywhere, so it looks
> like it worked more or less by accident.  We don't use it anywhere else
> either (e.g. %expect 0, not %expect=0).

Hah.  That's probably my fault, somewhere way back when.  I'll fix it,
unless you're already on it.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Bison 3.0 updates
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Bison 3.0 updates