Re: Bison 3.0 updates - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Bison 3.0 updates
Date
Msg-id 53863018.8040203@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bison 3.0 updates  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 5/28/14, 2:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> What they want is that you use
>>     %name-prefix "base_yy"
>> instead of
>>     %name-prefix="base_yy"
>> That makes the warning go away.
> 
> Oh really!?
> 
>> The %something=something syntax is not documented anywhere, so it looks
>> like it worked more or less by accident.  We don't use it anywhere else
>> either (e.g. %expect 0, not %expect=0).
> 
> Hah.  That's probably my fault, somewhere way back when.  I'll fix it,
> unless you're already on it.

Go ahead.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bison 3.0 updates
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonb failed assertions