Re: 9.5alpha1: Partial index not used - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: 9.5alpha1: Partial index not used
Date
Msg-id 8852.1438454030@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.5alpha1: Partial index not used  ("Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>)
Responses Re: 9.5alpha1: Partial index not used  ("Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>)
List pgsql-bugs
"Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at> writes:
> On 2015-07-31 20:03:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Only the last case produces use of the index.  I agree that it'd be better
>> if they all did, but I'm disinclined to consider it a bug fix unless you
>> can show a specific case in which there's a performance regression from
>> older releases.

> "grossly incorrect plan choices are cause for a bug report" (from
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/indexes-partial.html) ;-)

Sorry, I phrased that poorly.  I meant that I'm disinclined to change
this behavior in stable branches unless it's a regression.  I agree
that it's reasonable to fix it in 9.5/HEAD, and I've now done so.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #13530: sort receives "unexpected out-of-memory situation during sort"
Next
From: "Peter J. Holzer"
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.5alpha1: Partial index not used