Re: 9.5alpha1: Partial index not used - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter J. Holzer
Subject Re: 9.5alpha1: Partial index not used
Date
Msg-id 20150801204102.GB18043@hjp.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.5alpha1: Partial index not used  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On 2015-08-01 14:33:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at> writes:
> > On 2015-07-31 20:03:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I agree that it'd be better if they all did, but I'm disinclined to
> >> consider it a bug fix unless you can show a specific case in which
> >> there's a performance regression from older releases.
>=20
> > "grossly incorrect plan choices are cause for a bug report" (from
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/indexes-partial.html) ;-)
>=20
> Sorry, I phrased that poorly.  I meant that I'm disinclined to change
> this behavior in stable branches unless it's a regression.  I agree
> that it's reasonable to fix it in 9.5/HEAD, and I've now done so.

Cool, thanks!

    hp

--=20
   _  | Peter J. Holzer    | I want to forget all about both belts and
|_|_) |                    | suspenders; instead, I want to buy pants=20
| |   | hjp@hjp.at         | that actually fit.
__/   | http://www.hjp.at/ |   -- http://noncombatant.org/

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.5alpha1: Partial index not used
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing file versions for a bunch of dll/exe files in Windows builds