Thomas Lockhart <thomas@fourpalms.org> writes:
> ...
>
> Agreed.
>
> > For PostgreSQL to achieve its real potential, the game must be played.
>
> Hmm. Would "PostgreSQL version (Oracle + 1)i" be too transparent? ;)
>
> - Thomas
I think that it makes better sense than PostgreSQL XP. Whatever
"marketing" you guys plan to do make sure you mix in a vowel or two.
Personally I would promote the idea of going "all out" and naming the
new version of PostgreSQL something like:
PostgreSQL 2002i XP Anywhere eDatabase-O-Matic.NET
This might require a change in the MP3 pronunciation file, and you
probably wouldn't want to make the name change official until you
bumped up the maximum column length.
Jason
