Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?
Date
Msg-id 87wtrr1mih.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:

> > I assume AMCC == 3ware now?
> >
> > Has anyone verified that fsync is safe on these controllers? Ie, that they
> > aren't caching writes and "lying" about the write completing like IDE
> > drives often do by default?
>
> The higher end AMCC/3ware controllers actually warn you about using
> write-cache. You have to explicitly turn it on within the controller
> bios.

Well that's a good sign.

But if they're using SATA drives my concern is that the drives themselves may
be doing some caching on their own. Has anyone verified that the controllers
are disabling the drive cache or issuing flushes or doing something else to be
sure to block the drives from caching writes?

--
greg

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Delete query takes exorbitant amount of time
Next
From: Cott Lang
Date:
Subject: Re: How to improve db performance with $7K?