Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Gierth
Subject Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Date
Msg-id 87sfb4gwgv.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
List pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:

 > On 6/6/23 15:55, Tom Lane wrote:
 >> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
 >>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 3:25 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
 >>>> Also +1, except that I find "none" a rather confusing choice of name.
 >>>> There *is* a provider, it's just PG itself not either libc or ICU.
 >>>> I thought Joe's suggestion of "internal" made more sense.
 >>
 >>> Or perhaps "builtin" or "postgresql".
 >> Either OK by me

 Joe> Same here

I like either "internal" or "builtin" because they correctly identify
that no external resources are used. I'm not keen on "postgresql".

--
Andrew.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Assert failure of the cross-check for nullingrels
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving FTS for Greek