Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Date
Msg-id 531936a9-31cb-9734-5a66-7c210133cc1b@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/6/23 15:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 3:25 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Also +1, except that I find "none" a rather confusing choice of name.
>>> There *is* a provider, it's just PG itself not either libc or ICU.
>>> I thought Joe's suggestion of "internal" made more sense.
> 
>> Or perhaps "builtin" or "postgresql".
> 
> Either OK by me

Same here

-- 
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Cleaning up nbtree after logical decoding on standby work