Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Gierth
Subject Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date
Msg-id 87o9ewfbar.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Andres" == Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:

 Andres> My read of the concensus (in which I am in the majority, so I
 Andres> might be biased) is that we do want inlining to be the default.
 Andres> We were thinking that it'd be necessary to provide a way to
 Andres> force inlining on the SQL level for individual CTEs.

For the record, here is where it came up in the original discussion
exactly 10 years ago when the feature was being added:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/87myk1rg4z.fsf%40news-spur.riddles.org.uk#35efe8ef370518116c38ddc550632aa0

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs