Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8
Date
Msg-id 87n0pbnzmi.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8  ("joel w. reed" <jreed@ddiworld.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> The HAS_CRYPT_R is true because the function is available even without the
> prototype, but the struct is not.  A plain bug in Perl's configury
> mechanism.

Yeah, that's true. The question is whether it's worth working around
the bug. IMHO, yes -- but what do other people think?

-- 
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: ECPG and bison
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: compile error in CVS HEAD