Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From joel w. reed
Subject Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8
Date
Msg-id 20021107194229.GA6342@ddiworld.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/Perl and Perl 5.8  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/18/02, Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > The HAS_CRYPT_R is true because the function is available even without the
> > prototype, but the struct is not.  A plain bug in Perl's configury
> > mechanism.
>
> Yeah, that's true. The question is whether it's worth working around
> the bug. IMHO, yes -- but what do other people think?

this message spells out the problem & solution nicely:
http://mailman.cs.uchicago.edu/pipermail/swig-dev/2002-September/
008056.html

jr


>
> --
> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

--
------------------------------------------------------------
Joel W. Reed                                    412-257-3881
--------All the simple programs have been written.----------


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Prime Ho"
Date:
Subject: get the source table.field name from a view's field
Next
From: Bill Gribble
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Database replication... - Mission Critica