Re: request for feedback - read-only GUC variables, pg_settings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: request for feedback - read-only GUC variables, pg_settings
Date
Msg-id 87n0a84jvt.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: request for feedback - read-only GUC variables, pg_settings  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: request for feedback - read-only GUC variables, pg_settings  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

> I hate to reply to this because I have already cast my vote, but
> "block_size" does not report the size of a disk block.  It reports the
> size of a PostgreSQL block/page.  Disk blocks are almost always 512
> bytes in size.

Perhaps then neither "block" nor "page" is best. Perhaps it should be
"buffer_size" or something like that?

-- 
greg



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Minor (very) feature request...
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Minor (very) feature request...