Re: request for feedback - read-only GUC variables, pg_settings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: request for feedback - read-only GUC variables, pg_settings
Date
Msg-id 200312061531.hB6FVaj00698@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: request for feedback - read-only GUC variables, pg_settings  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> 
> > I hate to reply to this because I have already cast my vote, but
> > "block_size" does not report the size of a disk block.  It reports the
> > size of a PostgreSQL block/page.  Disk blocks are almost always 512
> > bytes in size.
> 
> Perhaps then neither "block" nor "page" is best. Perhaps it should be
> "buffer_size" or something like that?

It is really the storage block size, and that is manifest in the buffer
size and disk block size used.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres 7.3.5 and count('x')
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Transaction Question