Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Florian Weimer
Subject Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and
Date
Msg-id 87lkwgb4lg.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and  ("Richard P. Welty" <rwelty@averillpark.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
* Marc G. Fournier:

> according to FreeBSD ports:
>
>    subversion uses it
>    openldap server uses it

And the latter is really crucial and they could hardly switch to
anything else without losing credibility.

Sleepycat also has got an impressive customer list:

  <http://www.sleepycat.com/customers/customerlist.html>

Most of these companies already have to deal with Oracle, though. 8-/

> So, if you are going to be "concerned" about any of Oracle's
> acquisitions, one should just look at their own desktop/servers to see
> how much the SleepyCat one will potentially affect them :(

I'm running a custom-written database on top of Berkeley DB (which I
plan to migrate to PostgreSQL for the sake of ad-hoc queries), and I'm
not *that* concerned.  I'm using Sleepycat's copyleft licensing
option, and nobody can take that copy away from me.  Your mail servers
are probably similar: the copyleft license you already have is good
enough.

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Florian Weimer
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and
Next
From: "Richard P. Welty"
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and