Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> One thing that is *not* fine is something that I see had snuck past
> me in the previous WITH OIDS patch. It is not okay for gram.y or
> scan.l to be looking at GUC variables --- that creates
> synchronization issues.
Good point (I remember reading gram.y's warning about this, but it
must have slipped my mind...). Attached is a revised patch that
corrects this.
-Neil
