Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chris Browne
Subject Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user
Date
Msg-id 87eigpcoqp.fsf@ca.afilias.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Exposing the Xact commit order to the user  (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
drkp@csail.mit.edu (Dan Ports) writes:
> I'm not clear on why the total rowcount is useful, but perhaps I'm
> missing something obvious.

It would make it easy to conclude:
  "This next transaction did 8328194 updates.  Maybe we should do  some kind of checkpoint (e.g. - commit transaction
orsuch) before  working on it."
 
   versus
  "This transaction we're thinking of working on had 7 updates.  No  big deal..."
-- 
(reverse (concatenate 'string "ofni.secnanifxunil" "@" "enworbbc"))
http://linuxfinances.info/info/finances.html
Rules of  the Evil Overlord #189. "I  will never tell the  hero "Yes I
was the one who  did it, but you'll never be able  to prove it to that
incompetent  old fool."  Chances  are, that  incompetent  old fool  is
standing behind the curtain."  <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay