Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Jim Nasby wrote:
>> Do we officially not support anything > -O2? If so it'd be nice if configure
>> threw at least a warning (if not an error that you had to explicitly
>> over-ride).
>
> Keep in mind this is Sun OS C -- not one of the most popular compilers
> in the world. I don't know what you suggest: have a test program that
> configure runs and detects whether the compiler does the wrong thing?
> It doesn't seem a sane idea to maintain test cases for all known
> compiler bugs ...
I think the intention was to make configure complain if there's a -O > 2
in CFLAGS.
OTOH, a unit test for multixact.c that exercises the code including
wraparounds sounds like a desirable thing regardless of the fact that it
could have caught this miscompilation earlier than 6 months into
production.
regards,
Andreas
