Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls
Date
Msg-id 8797.1251471136@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to [PATCH] Largeobject access controls  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls  (KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> writes:
> The attached patch provides access control features on largeobject.
> This patch adds the ownership and two permissions (SELECT and UPDATE) on
> largeobjects. The two permissions controls reader and writer accesses to
> the largeobejcts.

What about DELETE permissions?  Should we track that separately from
UPDATE?

> The CREATE USER/ROLE statement got a new option: LARGEOBJECT/NOLARGEOBJECT.
> It enables to controls whether the user can create a largeobject, or not.

I don't think this is necessary or appropriate.

> The pg_largeobject system catalog is reworked to manage its metadata.
> Actual data chunks are stored in the toast relation of pg_largeobject,

This seems like a very confusing design, and one that (a) breaks
existing code to no purpose, (b) will greatly complicate in-place
upgrade.  Instead of abusing a toast relation to do something
nonstandard, keep pg_largeobject as it is now and add a new, separate
catalog that carries ownership and permissions info for each LO OID.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Werner Echezuria
Date:
Subject: Re: return a set of records
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: phypot - Pygmy Hippotause ?