Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Gierth
Subject Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions
Date
Msg-id 877en4t82y.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions
Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions
List pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

 > Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
 >> The real question is why check_function_bodies doesn't cover this;
 >> there's a comment in fmgr_c_validator that this is deliberate, but it's
 >> rather unclear what the advantage is supposed to be:

 Tom> Error detection, ie did you spell the C symbol name correctly.

Right, but surely restoring a dump is not the place to be doing that
error check?

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: assert in nested SQL procedure call in current HEAD
Next
From: Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski
Date:
Subject: Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions