"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:16 +0100, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> I ran some CPU intensive pgbench tests on HOT. Results are not
>> surprising, HOT makes practically no difference on the total transaction
>> rate, but reduces the need to vacuum:
>> ...
> Nor would I expect anything else, on this test.
I think the surprising thing was that it wasn't slower due to the extra cpu
spent pruning tuples.
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
