Re: Bad performance for a 3000 rows table updated - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From fred-pg@jolliton.com (Frederic Jolliton)
Subject Re: Bad performance for a 3000 rows table updated
Date
Msg-id 86of3ifzst.fsf@mau.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bad performance for a 3000 rows table updated  (Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at>)
List pgsql-novice
> On Sat, 05 Apr 2003 23:38:25 +0200, <fred-pg@jolliton.com>(Frederic
> Jolliton) wrote:
>>SELECT relname,relpages [...]
>>
>>give 156 for the main table, doing a VACUUM every minute,

Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at> writes:
> Is this number stable or always increasing?  If the latter, how fast
> is it growing?

Just checked, I have actually 236. Runnnig a VACUUM FULL take less
than 1 second, and the value decreased to 174. But, waiting ~20
minutes, I now have 220. I think value stop progressing when reaching
~240. If I guess correctly, 236 is the maximum space that the table
used. Since the number of row rarely grow, and field length average
are almost constant, I expect this maximum value to stay also
constant.

--
Frédéric Jolliton


pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: Manfred Koizar
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad performance for a 3000 rows table updated
Next
From: "Alessandro Galasso"
Date:
Subject: Basic info