Re: [HACKERS] Did the inet type get backed out? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Did the inet type get backed out?
Date
Msg-id 86ems9do1k.fsf@athene.nhh.no
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Did the inet type get backed out?  (darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain))
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Did the inet type get backed out?  (darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain))
List pgsql-hackers
darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) writes:

> But it worked before.  In fact it still works on another system with
> an earlier compile.

"Works" for me, using a cvs update from yesterday morning (the morning
after the BETA 2 freeze), modulo the fact that someone committed
changes to #ifdef out ("#ifdef BAD") all the calls to the actual inet
parser routines, effectively causing all data to be rejected.  Since
we had an implementation that actually worked, and the changes that we
wanted to make were compatible with currently stored data, it would
have been smarter to leave it working until the changes were ready to
be committed.  It's better to be able to keep testing something that
doesn't have all the wanted functionality than to disable it until an
unknown time in the future!  :-)

-tih
--
Popularity is the hallmark of mediocrity.  --Niles Crane, "Frasier"

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Optimizing perfomance using indexes
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Did the inet type get backed out?