Re: Vacuum goes worse - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Brian Herlihy
Subject Re: Vacuum goes worse
Date
Msg-id 866613.1260.qm@web52305.mail.re2.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Vacuum goes worse  (Stéphane Schildknecht<stephane.schildknecht@postgresqlfr.org>)
Responses Re: Vacuum goes worse
Re: Vacuum goes worse
List pgsql-performance
Would it make sense to show the FSM stats for individual table vaccums as well?  I'm wondering if the reason they
aren'tshown is because it wouldn't be useful or isn't practical, or just that it hasn't been done. 

Brian

----- Original Message ----
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

If you're talking about the FSM statistics display, that only gets
printed by a database-wide VACUUM (one that doesn't name a specific
table).

            regards, tom lane




pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum goes worse
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum goes worse