Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jennifer Trey
Subject Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus?
Date
Msg-id 863606ec0903301136r4c4869falde8d33e3241d966e@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus?  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgsql-general
I am sorry, but it seems that I replied to only one of you instead of to the mailing list.

I am just about to install a version on my "Server computer" (Windows web server 2008 x64) and I am stuck on what I should go with. 

I have been developing on the standard postgreSQL but like that the EnterpriseDB webpage claims that "Standard Plus" is faster. 

Is there something that will work differently, more complex with that version? Not free, or similar? Something I should know? Why would they give out a better version, if both are free??? There is something fishy going on :P

Thanks / Jennifer

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 11:19 +0530, Ashish Karalkar wrote:

> Postgres Plus does support  Linux and it includes all the PostgreSQL
> features as well as have many other additional useful features.One of
> which is its dyna tune module.

Yes it does, but it doesn't use native packages (as far as I know).
Meaning, it doesn't use RPM or DEB.

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org
  Consulting, Development, Support, Training
  503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
  The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: running two clusters on one machine
Next
From: A B
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENEAL] dynamically changing table