Re: Do we need to back-patch tzcode 2026b after all? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Do we need to back-patch tzcode 2026b after all?
Date
Msg-id 85CA8500-000A-4686-9160-79F83E8129D4@yesql.se
Whole thread
In response to Do we need to back-patch tzcode 2026b after all?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 30 Sep 2026, at 04:21, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Or we could just decide that we doubt any extensions
> are calling those directly, and accept the API/ABI break.

A very unscientific search using Debian codesearch and Github didn't reveal any
extensions with such callsites (which admittedly seems like a quite plausible
result).

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: Persist slot invalidations before publishing them
Next
From: Zsolt Parragi
Date:
Subject: Re: injection_points: canceled or terminated waiters leak their wait slots