Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Date
Msg-id 8588.1210177204@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists  ("Matthew T. O'connor" <matthew@zeut.net>)
Responses Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists  ("Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Matthew T. O'connor" <matthew@zeut.net> writes:
> Patches are an integral part of the conversation about development, I 
> think trying to split them up is awkward at best.  Do people really 
> still think that the potential for larger messages is really a problem?  

Personally I'd be fine with abandoning -patches and just using -hackers.
We could try it for awhile, anyway, and go back if it seems worse.

> By the way, what is the actual size limit on hackers vs patches.

They do have different size limits; we'd have to raise the limit on
-hackers if we do this.  Marc would know exactly what the limits are.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marc Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Next
From: "Brendan Jurd"
Date:
Subject: Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists