Re: text coverage for EXTRACT() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 2020-06-09 16:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org> writes:
>> On 6/9/20 1:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> During the discussion in [0] I noticed that the extract()/date_part()
>>> variants for time, timetz, and interval had virtually no test coverage.
>>> So I put some more tests together, which should be useful if we decide
>>> to make any changes in this area per [0].
> 
>> These look straightforward to me.
> 
> +1 here as well.

committed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services