Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Date
Msg-id 84953.1512017135@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:34:56PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't really have an opinion about the relative merits of these changes,
>> but why do anything?  The existing solution has the buildfarm happy, and
>> we've not heard any field complaints that I saw.  I'm not sure we should
>> spend more time on supporting obsolete toolchain combinations that aren't
>> represented in the buildfarm.

> It's the other way around.  The buildfarm's 32-bit MSVC animals each use an
> obsolete Perl.  PostgreSQL is incompatible with today's 32-bit ActivePerl and
> Strawberry Perl.

Oh, OK.  In that case, we need to get some representatives of these
more modern builds into the buildfarm while we're at it.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] log_destination=file
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0