Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Date
Msg-id 1d22ca31-2301-143f-4b8f-eee7592baf53@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 11/29/2017 11:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:34:56PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I don't really have an opinion about the relative merits of these changes,
>>> but why do anything?  The existing solution has the buildfarm happy, and
>>> we've not heard any field complaints that I saw.  I'm not sure we should
>>> spend more time on supporting obsolete toolchain combinations that aren't
>>> represented in the buildfarm.
>> It's the other way around.  The buildfarm's 32-bit MSVC animals each use an
>> obsolete Perl.  PostgreSQL is incompatible with today's 32-bit ActivePerl and
>> Strawberry Perl.
> Oh, OK.  In that case, we need to get some representatives of these
> more modern builds into the buildfarm while we're at it.
>
>             



My 32 bit XP machine currawong/frogmouth builds against perl 5.16.3,
build dated 2014.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE