Re: [PATCHES] Text <-> C string - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Text <-> C string
Date
Msg-id 8456.1208358985@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Text <-> C string  ("Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Text <-> C string  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: [PATCHES] Text <-> C string  ("Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com> writes:
>> If we don't want to meddle with xmltype/bytea/VarChar at all, we'll
>> have to revert those changes, and I'll have to seriously scale back
>> the cleanup patch I was about to post.

> Still not sure where we stand on the above.  To cast, or not to cast?

I dunno.  I know there was previously some handwaving about representing
XML values in some more intelligent fashion than a plain text string,
but I have no idea if anyone is likely to do anything about it in the
foreseeable future.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_terminate_backend() issues
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: DROP DATABASE vs patch to not remove files right away