Re: [PATCHES] Text <-> C string - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Text <-> C string
Date
Msg-id 48061F5E.5070809@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Text <-> C string  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> If we don't want to meddle with xmltype/bytea/VarChar at all, we'll
>>> have to revert those changes, and I'll have to seriously scale back
>>> the cleanup patch I was about to post.
>>>
>
>
>> Still not sure where we stand on the above.  To cast, or not to cast?
>>
>
> I dunno.  I know there was previously some handwaving about representing
> XML values in some more intelligent fashion than a plain text string,
> but I have no idea if anyone is likely to do anything about it in the
> foreseeable future.
>
>
>

It seems very unlikely to me.

cheers

andrew

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving planner variable handling
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_terminate_backend() issues