Re: Fwd: Re: SSDD reliability - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Florian Weimer
Subject Re: Fwd: Re: SSDD reliability
Date
Msg-id 82mxj1o87e.fsf@mid.bfk.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fwd: Re: SSDD reliability  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Fwd: Re: SSDD reliability
Re: Fwd: Re: SSDD reliability
List pgsql-general
* Greg Smith:

> Intel claims their Annual Failure Rate (AFR) on their SSDs in IT
> deployments (not OEM ones) is 0.6%.  Typical measured AFR rates for
> mechanical drives is around 2% during their first year, spiking to 5%
> afterwards.  I suspect that Intel's numbers are actually much better
> than the other manufacturers here, so a SSD from anyone else can
> easily be less reliable than a regular hard drive still.

I'm a bit concerned with usage-dependent failures.  Presumably, two SDDs
in a RAID-1 configuration are weared down in the same way, and it would
be rather inconvenient if they failed at the same point.  With hard
disks, this doesn't seem to happen; even bad batches fail pretty much
randomly.

--
Florian Weimer                <fweimer@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Toby Corkindale
Date:
Subject: Re: SSDD reliability
Next
From: Kunal Ashar
Date:
Subject: 64-bit PostgreSQL AMI for CentOS 5.5?