Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Florian Weimer
Subject Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq
Date
Msg-id 82fwe0z7wr.fsf@mid.bfk.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq  (Alex Shulgin <ash@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq  (Cédric Villemain <cedric@2ndquadrant.fr>)
Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq  (Alexander Shulgin <ash@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Alex Shulgin:

>> It's ugly, but it's standard practice, and seems better than a separate
>> -d parameter (which sort of defeats the purpose of URIs).
>
> Hm, do you see anything what's wrong with "?dbname=other" if you don't
> like a separate -d?

It's not nice URI syntax, but it's better than an out-of-band mechanism.

--
Florian Weimer                <fweimer@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alex Shulgin
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.2] Add GUC sepgsql.client_label