Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Cédric Villemain
Subject Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq
Date
Msg-id 201202252037.02330.cedric@2ndquadrant.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq  (Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Le vendredi 24 février 2012 14:18:44, Florian Weimer a écrit :
> * Alex Shulgin:
> >> It's ugly, but it's standard practice, and seems better than a separate
> >> -d parameter (which sort of defeats the purpose of URIs).
> >
> > Hm, do you see anything what's wrong with "?dbname=other" if you don't
> > like a separate -d?
>
> It's not nice URI syntax, but it's better than an out-of-band mechanism.

I've not followed all the mails about this feature but I don't find it is a
nice syntax too.

"?dbname=other" looks like dbname is an argument, but dbname is a requirement
for postgresql connexion.

--
Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/
PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: check constraint validation takes access exclusive locks
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: check constraint validation takes access exclusive locks