Re: coverage increase for worker_spi - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: coverage increase for worker_spi
Date
Msg-id 82513.1559409785@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: coverage increase for worker_spi  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: coverage increase for worker_spi
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I ended up with these two patches.  I'm not sure about pushing
> separately.  It seems pointless to backport the "fix" to back branches
> anyway.

Patch passes the eyeball test, though I did not try to run it.
I concur with squashing into one commit and applying to HEAD only.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: Index Skip Scan
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Docs for refresh materialized view concurrently