Re: Removing obsolete configure checks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Removing obsolete configure checks
Date
Msg-id 804996.1658549131@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Removing obsolete configure checks  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Removing obsolete configure checks
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 7:00 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> All of the above are required by C99 and/or SUSv2, and the configure-using
>> buildfarm members are unanimous in reporting that they have them, and
>> msvc/Solution.pm expects Windows to have them.

> I think the same now applies to <wctype.h>, without gaur.  So I
> propose the attached.  I split it into two patches, because 0001 is
> based on scraping build farm configure output, while 0002 is an
> educated guess and might finish up needing to be reverted if I'm
> wrong.

+1.  SUSv2 is perfectly clear that <wctype.h> is supposed to declare
these functions.  I'm not surprised that gaur's 1996-ish system headers
failed to see into the future; but prairiedog is up to speed on this
point, and I should think all the surviving BF animals are too.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Expose Parallelism counters planned/execute in pg_stat_statements
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Removing obsolete configure checks